CORPORATE COMMUNICATION IN
CONTEMPORARY ORGANIZATIONS
The
evolution of communication disciplines and techniques that are used by
organizations to promote, publicize or generally inform relevant individuals
and groups within society about their affairs began at least 150 years ago.
From the Industrial Revolution until the 1930s, an era predominantly
characterized by mass production and consumption, the type of communications
that were employed by organizations largely consisted of publicity, promotions
and selling activities to buoyant markets. The move towards less stable, more
competitive markets, which coincided with greater government interference in
many markets and harsher economic circumstances, resulted from the 1930s
onwards in a constant redefining of the scope and practices of communication in
many organizations in the Western world. Communication practitioners had to
rethink their discipline and developed new practices and areas of expertise in
response to changing circumstances in the markets and societies in which they
were operating.
The
historical development of communication within organizations and the emergence
of corporate communication. It starts with a brief discussion of the historical
development of separate communication disciplines, such as marketing
communication and public relations, and moves on to explain why organizations
have increasingly drawn these disciplines together under the umbrella of
corporate communication. The chapter concludes with discussing the ways in
which contemporary organizations organize communication activities in order to
strategically plan and coordinate the release of messages to different
stakeholder groups.
This
brief notes is about the changing definition, scope and organization of
communication in organizations, and about the societal and market dynamics that
triggered its evolution. A brief sketch will be provided of the historical evolution
of the two main individual communication disciplines in each organization:
marketing and public relations. The chapter will describe the development of
both disciplines and will then move on to discuss why organizations have
increasingly started to see these disciplines not in isolation but as part of
an integrated effort to communicate with stakeholders. This integrated effort
is directed and coordinated by the management function of corporate
communication. As a result of this development, managers in most corporate
organizations have realized that the most effective way of organizing
communication consists of ‘integrating’ most, if not all, of an organization’s
communication disciplines and related activities, such as media relations,
issues management, advertising and direct marketing. The basic idea is that
whereas communication had previously been organized and managed in a rather
fragmented manner, a more effective organizational form is one that integrates
or coordinates the work of various communication practitioners. At the same
time, when communication practitioners are pulled together, the communication
function as a whole is more likely to have an input into strategic
decision-making at the highest corporate level of an organization.
HISTORICAL
BACKGROUND
Communication
management – any type of communication activity undertaken by an organization
to inform, persuade or otherwise relate to individuals and groups in its
outside environment – is, from a historical perspective, not new. But the
modernization of society, first through farming and trade, and later through
industrialization, created ever more complex organizations with more
complicated communication needs. The large industrial corporations that emerged
during the Industrial Revolution in the nineteenth century in the UK, in the
USA and later on in the rest of the Western world required, in contrast to what
had gone before, professional communication officers and a more organized form
of handling publicity and promotions.
BY KYEJU DIANA
BAPRM 42589
No comments:
Post a Comment